When you check a username after voting for a friend before the 'Last' vote timer resets and you get this instead.
Ha, that's interesting! I think that's because if someone has never voted, they won't have a value for 'last voted'. In that case, if it would try to parse when they last voted, an exception would be thrown. To avoid this, lastvoted gets a default value of 0, so even if the person hasn't voted before, there is something to interpret for this value. But of course it shouldn't say "Last: 0 seconds" if the player hasn't voted before, so that's why Aikar or someone else made it say "Last: Never" instead for a value of 0.
That moment when you realise you've messed up... I replied to say it was fine, and I could easily imagine being in the same situation.
It took me two or three times to interpret it the right way, so for some reason it's easily misunderstood.
Probably because I omitted the context: an e-mail two hours earlier, asking me for another donation (well, not another, but... you get the issue).
*facepalm but different as I've gotten used to wearing glasses* xD That's interesting, then. Maybe it's because I used a non-standard explanation, as I wanted to do it from cause to result instead of from result to cause.
Probably because of the underlined and especially the bold bits: You're all on about "never" and "hasn't", which is quite confusing.
I don't think so, I think by almost everyone "has never" and "hasn't" are easily interpreted to mean the same.
Ah, right. Well, then it is indeed because of this. To me this way of explaining actually might be easier to understand, as it's chronological, and that often helps me.
The thing is, you're talking (or seem to be) about when someone has NOT voted before, while that person has. You don't literally mention that this is also the case for when people have voted before. That moment when you still don't understand us.
I do understand you at this point, I'm quite certain. I do indeed not literally mention that, but I refer to it in the last line:
...this is a working 4*4 door... Only 112 blocks... 1 deep, 8 high 14 wide. WORLD RECORD Sadly, not by me. Someone showed this to me some time ago, I'm just blown away by it... like... it's simply too small. I'm not bad at redstone, not at all, I have compactemise world records myself, but my personal record at a 4*4 is 180 blocks... (though I'm almost finished with a 160 now, I hope)
