Should the Boston Marathon Bomber be put to death?Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, proven guilty of all counts accused of involving the bombing of the Boston marathon is at risk of the death penalty. If the jury decides he deserves it, then that's what he is in for. Lots of people are on both sides. What side are you on? Should he be executed or imprisoned? I personally think he should be imprisoned. My view is - We are insignificant little human beings. We have no right to decide anyone's fate or if they "deserve" death for their crimes. It is just as much of a crime, if not more of one in my opinion to kill someone or decide on their death in retaliation. Even if they kill a million, a billion people, we have no right to do anything to them if we are not defending ourselves physically. Now, this does NOT say that I think that what he did is okay, even remotely. I personally believe that he is (was) a horrible idiotic teenager who did not know the weight of his actions. But that does not give us the right to decide if he needs to die. What do you think?Edit: As far as appropriateness goes, everything here is PG. The death penalty is something I learned about deliberately from my third grade teacher. (Yes in third grade). There is nothing above PG in this thread. Even if it was, there is a reason commercials for online games targeted at children have to say "Ask your parents before going online." Legally, no one under the age of 13 should be on the Internet at all without parent approval (in the U.S., which is where he served is based) I know EMC is a family friendly server, but everything here is what the administration considers "PG." PG in movies means that parents are recommended to supervise their children while watching. Just to let anyone with questions know. Please let's not get too off topic.