Finally one I can figure out. 15 = -4/4 + 4(4) Or, written in a more reasonable manner... 15 = 4 * 4 - 4 / 4
21: ( 4^(ln(e^(ln(e)))) * sqrt(4) + (ln(4)/elog(4))) + ( 4!/sqrt(4) - (sqrt(4)log(4)) ) I know I used log, but ln is a log too and I didnt use it in any way like you have shown in the OP (also you could do it way more easier with (4 + 4 + (whatever number you want to get in 4's) )/4 so yeah..." Also sqrt actually could be considered having a 2 with it... or you would have to write it as (4+4)√((whatever you want in your sqrt)^4) Also I wonder if anyone is even going to attempt verifying these answers
Rule: "...only using four fours..." So I think we're still looking for 21? I'm checking them quietly. Because if I think an answer is wrong, it's probably my own mistake.
Whoops! My bad :3. For some reason I completely skipped the part where it said four . Let me redo this then :3, since my first version was only with alot of nonsense thrown in between to make it look more complicated . 4 * (4 + ln(e)) + 4/4
I'm just going to be anooying here Isn't e also a number... I said e^x is legal as that is a function of sorts (you use it everywhere) but e or e^1 is a number, no doubt about it
You have the right to . But for example, if I would change the ln(e) to ln(e^x)/x would that be allowed then? since I dont really change anything but I do use the ^x now... EDIT: I realize that it would be the same as dividing x by x to get 1, which kinda doesnt make this the best thing to use here because then you could just x/x + x/x + x/x... etc but maybe it is allowed?
Well, I ment e^x as in e^4 or e^4*4 I personally wouldn't know how to use it, but e^x is a function of sorts with x being just any odd thing you'd like to ad. not keeping the x... that is kind of silly...
This is getting more interesting with rule discussion and such. I suspected some of the issues haastregt is suggesting, when I first read the rules... but I thought I'd keep quiet about them, as I'm not too good at maths at the moment.
Nice. This should be a nice addition. 44 / sqrt(sqrt(4*4)). In the above counting I used concatenation meaning 4 || 4 = 44. I thought what could be the biggest number you can make with only four 4's. First let's try an obvious example, something like 4^4^4^4 = 256^256 ~ 3.4 * 10^38. Yes, very big. With the silly exception using the exponential function gives e^(4^4^4^4) which is much bigger but is a very silly answer if you ask me... Thus, using concatenation we could try 4^444 = 2.1 * 10^267. MUCH bigger! Maybe 44^44 is an option? 44^44 = 2.1 * 10^72. Not that large, huh. It's only the amount of atoms on earth, times one BILLION. So the biggest number I found was 4^444 Will update later. And here is 24, as writing this post took so long: 24 = 4 * 4 + 4 + 4
im pretty sure theres some integral like fnInt(-44,44)X^Xdx or something that's bigger. the rules arent exactly clear on using X or not, but if it is then its big. Also if you count the use of e, then it can be infinitely big, e^e^e^e^e^e^e^4444
