I don't really like the new rule either, not necessairily because of what the rule changes in tactics, but more because if someone manages to be immune for 3 rounds in a row, I think they did a very good job and would deserve their immunity. It's quite hard to be immune for 3 (or more) consecutive rounds. Or I am just a noob player
You'd think it would be hard to be immune 3 rounds in a row but somebody's already done it I'll just get rid of the rule
Oh, wow lol. I'm not saying that you should remove it though, it is your game afterall. Just voicing my thoughts, I can see that the rule could also be interesting, maybe there are also people who like it.
Most voted: ASliceOfRhyBread (5 votes) Safe: DufTheHalls, 607, GeneralWillikers, Skeletin007, ASliceOfRhyBread, Jelle68 The First Loser: EquableHook (2 votes) Unsafe: ItsMeWolffpack, Smooshed_Potato, TomvanWijnen, Sydney4363, haastregt, Eviltoade A tie occurred between EquableHook and ItsMeWolffpack and was determined using random.org
Most voted: ItsMeWolffpack (4 votes) Safe: ItsMeWolffpack, Smooshed_Potato, 607, Sydney4363 The First Loser: TomvanWijnen (3 votes) Unsafe: DufTheHalls, GeneralWillikers, Skeletin007, ASliceOfRhyBread, haastregt, Eviltoade, Jelle68 Round 6 will end in 48 hours or when all votes have been received
Most voted: Skeletin007 (3 votes) Safe: 607, GeneralWillikers, Skeletin007, Eviltoade The First Loser: ASliceOfRhyBread (2 votes) Unsafe: ItsMeWolffpack, Smooshed_Potato, DufTheHalls, haastregt, Jelle68 Round 7 will end in 48 hours or when all votes are received
Most voted: Sydney4363 (5 votes) Safe: ItsMeWolffpack, Smooshed_Potato, 607, Sydney4363 The First Loser: Dufne (2 votes) Unsafe: GeneralWillikers, Skeletin007, haastregt, Eviltoade, Jelle68 Since the board is shrinking some more, not as many people will be safe. Random.org was used to decide whether Sydney's row or column will be safe. In the future, that decision will be up to the most voted person. Round 8 will end in 48 hours or after all votes are received
>.> It was actually my plan to have a very limited amount of people that would be able to be voted on this round.. :/ But now I only made myself in more danger this round. So, I'd like you all to vote on me this round to keep me in the game. I'm immunizing (is that a word lol) my row so a couple of you will even profit from it
My decision was actually based on previous games (and recommendations from people who hosted the game in the past). It just didn't seem like an ideal outcome
I do understand why you choose for it, and I don't blame you or anything Just that I didn't count on the rule to be implemented without notice beforehand, and that it came kind of unlucky since I would otherwise have voted different especially in this case. But it's okay, really
Seems like a plan. After that round, vote for me, please? I would have to make quite some people safe, no matter whether I go for row or column.
Honestly, it would have been interesting if this known rule would be added one round later, as then now there would only be a winner and one loser... Would make for some early end-game-style bribing! But it might be good to safe that.
I changed the rule so suddenly because when I was working on the results it caught me off guard I asked people who were already out what I should do and none of them suggested leaving it that way. If I do make another change like that I'll give everyone a heads up first though
Most voted: Skeletin007 (5 votes) Safe: 607, GeneralWillikers, Skeletin007 The First Loser: Eviltoade (2 votes) Unsafe: ItsMeWolffpack, Smooshed_Potato, Sydney4363, haastregt, Jelle68 Round 9 will end in 48 hours or when all votes are received
Well poo. I don't get this game lol. For someone to have all these votes, yall have to be working together? Or once you have experience, you just sort of "know" who to vote for? Either way, weird game....
I did intend on getting you out, but I was expecting haastregt to win. Anyway, I'll vote Sydney next! Edit: I'm sorry for trying to get you out, you actually helped me before. But such is the game!