Thank you for sharing this. I have studied it very closely and used an applied digital human modeling program on it. Based on this I have come to the conclusion that it is in fact not Vladimir but actually the Vision. And it is very very much a sign. A sign that there will be some amazing Avengers movies coming out. I'm so excited I can barely stand it.
I am generally skeptical of things I see on the internet like this. It is pretty easy to see images in our surroundings, like clouds, wood grain, or toast even. What I distrust about this video is that the camera was zoomed in ahead of time to catch the image. To make it worse(for me), whoever edited the video circled the obvious which ticked me off a bit. Also, Putin? That image certainly looks humanoid and probably male, but I don't see anything about it that says it looks more like Putin than myself, Phil Collins, Sting, etc.
There is nothing wrong with a civil debate of any kind. We have had civil debates about religion in the past.
It's off topic, and the past two threads posted about religion were shut down due to the fact that some people on the forums can not have a civil debate about religion.
Leave it up to EMC to come up with stuff which persuades you with sharing more than you're comfortable with (no joke) but because off all the familiar names.. (also no joke). I'm not at my best right now, pardon any.. weird comments. I know Tarot. (no, they are not a player) Not just that, worse, I think there can be some truth or realism in coincidence too. Do note: I am SO not going to comment on this here. What is coincidence? A very small rant: I think too many people think way too lightly on this. Was is just coincidence or meant to be? This is as far as I take this. ... at least at this time.
Sorry Shell, I don't think that is what a coincidence is. Also, you need sleep or see if Aikar can lend you a 5 hour energy.
We'll see I think the "damage" has been done anyway Do note: I don't see anything in the OP post. Not what I was referring to in the first place. But you meeting with them out of the blue? That one song you hoped for playing on the radio "at that time"? Meh.. I said enough. Back to mining!
I, for one, welcome our Russian overlords. Maybe they'll cause people to stop getting all paranoid by edited videos.
evolution has never been disproved for the same reason it is a theory, you cannot have it both ways. it is a theory because like many things science bases information on its accepted facts on speculation. but do you know what else is a theory? gravity. other things that can be called a theory: energy, mass, all of the sciences that arent directly observed down to their quantum levels, math, zero, infinity and everything in between. because something has neither been proven true or untrue undeniably does not make it reasonably true. its reasonably true that their are fossil records indicating that life began as single celled organisms, there is no acceptable evidence to disprove this. it is also reasonably true that the substratum under our feet contains literal mountains of evidence of a progression of the complexity of lifeforms. it is mostly undeniable that at the very least the earth is very very old compared to the time humans have spent here. im just curious if you doubt this information, what evidence do you have that the rest of the higher thinking human race doesn't? i am open to opposing theories if you have one
except evolution is not mutation its essentially the opposite (except by outdated textbooks). a mutation is a result of damage to dna, whereas an evolutionary progression is shaped more by genetic biodiversity then a sudden paradigm shift. your proposal states that things cannot adapt to their environment over millions of years and that if it did it wouldnt be a grouping but a single organism so then how do you explain humanities wisdom teeth, or vestigial tails, or even appendixes? this clearly is evidence of un-needed traits being bred out of use. even so lets say you are right and over aeons these low probability odds have no chance of occurring. what is your counter hypothesis? in my op, i said i was open to opposing theories. All you have presented is conjecture and tbh not very convincing conjecture at that. Present an opposing argument
His evidence that he's presented me in a PM is a bunch of biblical verses and Charles Darwin misquotes. He won't answer my question on background radiation either (after he claimed the Universe is only 6,000 years old). He seems to believe wisdom teeth are evidence of giant 'pre-flood' people, even though they would be useless for giants, lol. Another thing he's said is that carbon lasts for only 5,000 years, but hasn't took into account its half-life. >.>
