Suggestion: Derelict policy change

Discussion in 'Suggestion Box Archives' started by We3_10AC, Jul 21, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 3 of 3
  1. Honestly Id rather have the 1 million rupees than have the permanent derelict protector. Buts that just my 2 cents ( punny )
    ww2fan168, Jul 28, 2015
    #41
    ShelLuser likes this.


  2. Yes, I'm aware. I was suggesting a tiered, non-permanent protection plan upgradable to permanent derelict protection.

    Okay. It's all good, just spitballing. ;)
    NeedsFoodBadly, Jul 28, 2015
    #42
    We3_Nub_ and ShelLuser like this.
  3. My res doesn't change because it's finished and built. You'd want it erased just because I'm happy with it the way it is?

    :( thanks a lot, toade.
    Kephras, Jul 28, 2015
    #43
    ShelLuser and jkjkjk182 like this.
  4. Continue reading the thread, it is what he somewhat implied but not what he meant. For example; taking things out of chests could also be picked up as a change of some sort. Crops growing; idem ditto. I fully agree with you here; I'm also opposed to the idea, but there are some nuances to keep in mind.
    ShelLuser, Jul 28, 2015
    #44
    clan23 and ww2fan168 like this.
  5. The nuances of people bumping the idea that was looked over and denied x.x

    I'll report this thread for We3Mosses sake.
    CaptainFoxy_, Jul 28, 2015
    #45
    We3_Nub_ likes this.
  6. Yeah, I caught that after. Serves me right for not reading further - penance for my foolishness and all that.
    Kephras, Jul 28, 2015
    #46
    We3_Nub_ likes this.
  7. Thread closed per request.
    ElfinPineapple, Jul 28, 2015
    #47
    We3_Nub_ and ShelLuser like this.
Page 3 of 3
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.