I figured I'd start a new thread for this since we've totally hijacked the new rupee system's post lol. I've included contextual referenses to my response below. Lets continue this PvP discussion here instead. Shouldn't you ban him for admitting he engaged in PvP? That's as good as a screenshot isn't it? He should also turn in the names of those who attacked him so they can also be banned. But I guess the lack of a screenshot makes it impossible to prove?Thing is you can't ban him because you feel sorry for him being attacked and have no remorse for those that attacked him and failed...which says to me that you guys support passive PvP when the defender wins. No PvP means even the defender should be banned for fighting back even if the end result didn't end in death of anyone. The fact that they were trying to set him on fire meant they intended to kill him.You also know that in the heat of combat, you don't think to hit the F2 button and take a screenshot and therefore he probably couldn't get the names of the people due to the fact that the attack was a surprise to him, basic instinct kicks in and you defend yourself instead of going "help! admin! i'm under attack by XX and YY and ZZ!" in chat or pressing F2. What do you expect him to do? Stand there and take it? If he's running away the attackers are behind him and he won't be able to get a screenshot of their names anyway. Is it fair to him to be banned for combat that was instigated by others? Even if they did report him when they started it, when he comes back later and says "They started it." who do you believe? The fact that someone reports being attacked means they will themselves be investigated to see if they attacked back at some point because basic instinct is fight or flight, and neither is condusive for obtaining a screenshot of the situation that won't result in failed attempts to obtain such a screenshot or a self induced ban of themselves because the screenshot shows them holding a weapon of some kind that could be interpreted as fighting back or even assumed that they started it...I was thinking about this last night, andI think that if you guys implemented a PvP flag system that when you cause player damage in any form that it flags your character for PvP combat for 15 minutes and allows everyone who wants to engage you in combat this would stop these random attacks and at least give the players the ability to defend themselves and ask for help from those who want to help and are willing to be flagged for PvP as well. If a PvP server was setup, why would the griefers go there when everyone can fight back. They won't do it because they won't want to risk themselves. So the fact that a PvP server exists won't solve the griefing problem IMO.