I have a res I share with someone for storage. I want to let them have access to chests without an access sign but I do not want them to mess around with some items. Things like rates and valuable items. What I think is that there should be a restriction chest. It allows only the owner of the res or whoever is on the chest or whoever is named on the sign to access it (since there are no locked chests in town). If you want someone to be able to access the chests there can be a restriction-access fly which allows a player to access those chests or make their on on the res. [RESTRICTION]Olaf_Cname2name3Like it?
Hm. So let me see if I understand. You're suggesting an almost a near equivalent of an ACCESS chest, but the players listed are prevented from modifying the contents?
No. Let's say I give someone container flag but I do not want them to have access to a chest since I do not want then to mess or steal with it. The sign means only the people on the sign or people with the restriction flag can access.
Example Olaf: Hey Sky, have free container perms! Me: Alright! I will go now and steal your diamonds now! Olaf: Ha ha, nice try sky. I restricted them so only I can open the chest full of diamonds Me: Oh shucks. Olaf: Have a million rupees instead Me: Sweet! Can I have your supportership too! Olaf: Sure, just remember to grief my items. Me: No problem! Perhaps I went too far in the example...
Could this be added to all of the other lockable items as well? I know [LOCKED] signs work for more than just chests, like doors and buttons. So for say if I had a "restricted access" teleport button or door (residence shop staff entry only?), this could help out. Though, instead of saying [LOCKED], it says [RESTRICTION] like in your example. For your idea by itself: +1
I think what your asking for is the [LOCK] chest set up that we have in the wild to protect our items and you can add to other ppl to the chest, I guess it would not be too hard to make it work in town, Send it to the staff as a suggestion.
A reverse ACCESS chest, then. Interesting. +1 I was following you up until the last few lines...but otherwise clear explanation! Thanks!
Like the exanple, someone has all the basic flags on a red but you do not want them to access the chest for whatever reason.
