slash commands (denied)

Discussion in 'Suggestion Box Archives' started by TheCritic, Oct 15, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. it would be helpful for me if slash commands were interpreted this way.

    if the command matches no known command, then check this

    /(.*)(\d+)/

    /$1 $2

    so

    /vault8

    becomes

    /vault 8
    ChespinLover77, ShelLuser and 607 like this.
  2. I see.
    I've been thinking, would this be useful in any scenarios other than opening a vault?
    ChespinLover77 and ShelLuser like this.
  3. At first I thought you were requesting regular expressions for the Empire ;) (that would be cool though, but I don't think too many players would use that).

    I'm a little in between here, not in favor and not against. I can see the advantage this might have, but as 607 also said: how many times would this actually apply? I can come up with /smpx and /vaultx but not much more than that.
    ChespinLover77 likes this.
  4. /smpx actually works, though, I'm quite certain. :p
    ChespinLover77 likes this.
  5. /stable summon4
    ShelLuser and ChespinLover77 like this.
  6. /v TheCritic3

    /v TheCritic 3
    ShelLuser, ChespinLover77 and 607 like this.
  7. Sorry, problem here:
    I have multiple residences. My alt, named "TomvanWijnen2" has also multiple residences. I type /v TomvanWijnen2. Where do I want to go? TomvanWijnen-2, or actually TomvanWijnen2-1?
    (edit: problem solved! I like everything now. :))

    For the vault thingy, yes, I agree, that would be cool indeed. :)
    607 likes this.
  8. Not a problem.

    If you type

    /v TomvanWijnen2

    and it is a valid location, you will go there.

    If it is not a valid location, this will be tried:
    /v TomvanWijnen 2

    If this is a valid location, you will go there.

    If neither are valid locations, then a bad command error occurs.

    If you named your alt the same as your main, using a digit to differentiate them, then this code in half the instances (assuming 1 alt) will not really help you for /v commands. But it also wont hurt. It will still perform as expected today, and in the happy case you mistype something, you just might get where you are going.
    TomvanWijnen and 607 like this.
  9. Ah, neat solution! :) See the edit in my post for my current opinion - i.e., +1. :)
    607 likes this.
  10. Sorry. People just need to use the correct syntax when using commands. 1.13 will make this easier with the client side syntax stuff.

    Suggestion denied.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.