When I first locked a chest in the wild I flipped out Lol because I had to pay 1000 r. That was just crazy to me. So i was wondering if locks could be cheaper for supporters? Im seriously considering upgrading to diamond and that would be a huge deciding factor! Thanks
This is to prevent people exploiting them. Theoretically it could be used to make a wall or litter the wild.
The price of these would not stop someone if they really wanted to build a wall, though it has been previously stated in Mumble and a thread (not sure which) that building such things is in exploit of their built purpose. The expense is a money sink, which sadly means that lowering price for supportership is unlikly due to the additional rupee influx perday you would receive.
A wall which would actually block people would be millions of dollars. A diamond block is worth 450 to 540 rupees. This would theoretically be 3 million for a small wall and then it can grow hysterically in price
What wall? your not allowed to build a wall of chests, its the same category as Volts lava walls. if such a structure was allowed and existed other servers or even the outposts would be used inplace
It actually is cheaper for supporters. Supporters get a daily, whether signed in or not bonus of rupees. You could actually get a locked chest per day with that bonus if you needed it.
If people do that BAN them, simple. Why make others pay because there are people who could break the rules. It isn't fair to judge all of the sake of a few rule breakers. I am a free player whose only income comes from voting, so that 1k fee does not encourage me to waste my funds on locking a chest. If people have nothing better to do then break the rules then it is time for them to go. And it would be easy 'cause their name is on the sign... *EDIT* Forgot to hit the quote button... This is a reply to building walls with locked chests.
