Vault in the wild - make it permanent?

Discussion in 'Community Discussion' started by zulu9, Mar 22, 2012.


Should the /vault be available in the wild after the resets?

Poll closed Apr 5, 2012.
Yes! 6 vote(s) 15.4%
Yes, but at some rel. high cost. 13 vote(s) 33.3%
No. Things should go back to normal. 20 vote(s) 51.3%
  1. I really enjoy using the vault in the wild. Not really to make a fast profit but
    more to spare me the long way back and forth when transfering stuff from the wild
    to town and back. Why not make it permanent? Maybe with some relativly high cost
    to prevent abuse.
  2. This is a very bad idea. The Vault is only used to make transfers between servers, and adding another huge inventory to players makes the game different than it was originally played (meaning it wouldn't be legit any longer)
  3. if you really dont want the treck back, just make yourself an outpost when the reset happens and put a lock chest there. its only 1k.
  4. The way the EMC servers are the /wild is almost like a different server on each "real" server. I see the vault
    as a delivery service. There always was a 10r fee for town-to-town delivery, why not add a service from wild-to-town etc but at higher rates?
  5. because you can die in the wild. "oh look a large lava pit... I'm going to vault my entire inventory to make sure if I fall in I don't loose my stuff". It would also be bad since people with lots of rupees could essentially mine diamonds on one server, sell them on another to make up the money to open the vault again in the other server.
  6. I actually suggested something like this in another thread a while back. Something like it costing 1,000R to use the vault in the wild and having it only be available to you once a week. It's a nice thought, but I don't know that it could ever happen...
    hayleycolgan likes this.
  7. A high price and some kind of usage limit sure is a good idea. I would still like to see it.
    Or some other kind of mail like system in the game.
  8. I'm not sure if this is something that's good or bad. However IF it were something that would be possible, it would have to be an unreasonable high cost and maybe the size cut in half. Maybe something like /backpack. Haha.
    nnnnmc1 and hayleycolgan like this.
  9. Maybe (I hope so) the mods have the data from the free /vault time so they have some idea how ppl would use such a feature and what kind of restrictions are needed for it to work.
  10. I think it's a good idea
  11. No. Just no. This completely eliminates the idea of "legit" Minecraft. Yes, no one likes the trek, but if you don't like it then just don't go mining far in the first place, which is what you have to do to get anything anyways. The idea of Minecraft is the trek, that you always have to know where you are, and make sure you don't die. If vault were available in the wild then people would mine until their inv was full and not bring any food, then vault all their stuff and die to get back to town to avoid the trek. And people could also just vault stuff on another server and bring it into town on a different one. If I'm the only one that feels this way and everyone wants this, then go ahead, but put a reasonable fee on it, like 7k.
    failedreality likes this.
  12. I am all for a fee and I agree it has to be a rather large cost to not ruin the game. Also to limit the usage to like once a month or so might be a good idea.
    There are plenty of more restrictions we can think of:
    Like you can vault but only one item at a time, not costing 7K then of course but still some rather high amount.

    This poll is just about we want that option. Which kind of restrictions would be needed to mark it work will be left to another time.
  13. Totally right
  14. No. Just no. It ruins the survival aspect of the server. It is only used to make transfers across servers. But now that it's free, I use it if I have to die to get back somewhere and don't want to lose my items.
  15. Vault is only 10r. I don't think that that is an extremely huge fee.
  16. For town to town vault. I am supposing and /wild vault. The fee has the be bigger there to not make it ruin the fun of the game.
  17. I sadly haven't had a chance to test out the vault in wild, but I say no. :)
  18. Whats the big freaking deal. 80% of the people signed up to EMC don't even know or come to the forums so most won't know unless they read the "Empire Guide".

    Also, in making a fee, you gotta consider it's not ONE use of the vault. If you put something in you gotta be able to take it out with out being too expensive overall. What's the use of having it if NON-supporting players can't afford to use it. The more players that use it, the more RUPEE's used up in the community.

    I'm all for anything that make the game more interesting (including the PVP discussion). Anyone playing Vanilla lately??? I doubt many do as most have at least a texture pack. :cool:

    Hey Justin,... here's an idea.... lets just have a server where you can only play vanilla minecraft. NO Anything mods or texture packs etc.... :D
  19. Should only be for diamond supporter... we need a perk.
    AlexChance likes this.
  20. If your gonna put a fee, make it less than 1000 and more than it costs for a locked chest (try to figure out a cost) XD

    But seriously, No and no, we can't have a vault in the wild. Who's ever heard of a wilderness vault without a town?